Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy – Pakistan Journal of Urology (PJU)

The Pakistan Journal of Urology (PJU) follows a rigorous, double-blind peer-review process to ensure the highest standards of scientific integrity, accuracy, and relevance in urological research. The journal adheres to international best practices and ethical guidelines as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).

1. Manuscript Submission and Initial Assessment

All submitted manuscripts undergo a preliminary evaluation by the editorial office to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope, formatting requirements, and ethical considerations. Manuscripts that do not meet basic criteria may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected at this stage.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review Process

PJU employs a double-blind review system, where both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other, ensuring an unbiased and objective assessment. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent expert reviewers with expertise in the relevant field of urology.

3. Criteria for Evaluation

Reviewers evaluate submissions based on the following criteria:

  • Scientific Validity – Soundness of methodology, study design, statistical analysis, and conclusions.

  • Clinical Relevance – Practical applicability and contribution to urological practice.

  • Originality & Innovation – Novelty and significance of the research.

  • Ethical Compliance – Adherence to ethical standards, including informed consent and conflict of interest disclosures.

  • Quality of Presentation – Clarity, coherence, and adherence to journal formatting guidelines.

4. Reviewer Recommendations and Editorial Decision

Upon completing the review, reviewers provide one of the following recommendations:

  • Accept without revisions

  • Minor revisions required

  • Major revisions required

  • Reject

The Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with section editors, makes the final decision based on reviewer feedback. Authors are given an opportunity to respond to reviewer comments and submit revised manuscripts within the specified timeframe.

5. Ethical Considerations and Confidentiality

PJU maintains strict confidentiality throughout the peer-review process. Any potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed by authors and reviewers. Plagiarism, data fabrication, and duplicate submissions are strictly prohibited.

PJU’s peer-review policy ensures the publication of high-quality, impactful, and ethical research, contributing to advancements in urology and improving patient care worldwide.